When Will They Cancel Karl Marx?
Never, of course. On the revealing double standards of the woke left.
Discrediting a thinker’s broad worldview or legacy by discovering some statement from the distant past revealing him or her to be a bigot by today’s standards is a depressing degeneration in our intellectual life. It speaks of a compulsion to moralize rather than to understand, to shut down rather than expand debate.
Picasso was morally monstrous; but his painting is transcendent. And if you cannot disentangle the two, you are attacking a key liberal principle: that ideas and works of art should be considered on their merits, and not on the virtue or vice of their proponents.
But what makes this illiberalism even more repellent is how selective it is. For a few generations now, critical race theorists have attempted to cancel one Enlightenment thinker after another, excoriating Thomas Jefferson as a bigot and hypocrite, David Hume as a vicious racist, Immanuel Kant of all people for white supremacism. The Age of Reason has been recast as the Era of Hate.
In his new book, The War on the West, Douglas Murray quotes Black Studies professor Kehinde Andrews explaining the rationale for this: “A defense of liberalism is the worst possible thing you want to do. Because liberalism is the problem. It is the Enlightenment values which really cement racial prejudice.” The notion here is that human beings had no tribal, racial prejudices until the Age of Reason dawned. Racial hatred was invented by and is the exclusive property of white people in the last few hundred years. Seriously, that’s what the woke believe.
The attacks on Hume, Jefferson and Kant, moreover, refer to single sentences or asides that represent some of the lazy bigotries of the past. (The entire works of Aristotle and Plato are also on the chopping block because of their retrograde views on slavery, among other things.) And so one wonders if the same standard would apply to every philosopher in the past — way beyond the Enlightenment.
Well, one doesn’t wonder very much … because the bad faith of so much critical theory is a feature and not a bug. The goal is not to see the truth, but to gain power in order to impose their truth. And to accuse you of hate if you dare to demur.
Few examples demonstrate this better than Karl Marx, one of the most repellent anti-Semites and racists of the 19th century. Murray’s treatment is devastating. Let’s cite some of the greatest hits:
The Jewish nigger Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation ... It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nigger). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nigger-like.
Classic “race science” — yet the left pass it by. The following passage could come from Mein Kampf:
What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.
And this is not just a personal aside or footnote or private correspondence. It’s in a published essay, “On The Jewish Question,” from 1843.
What did Marx think of a multicultural society? Roughly what Richard Spencer believes today. In 1853, Marx wrote of the Balkans that the region had “the misfortune to be inhabited by a conglomerate of different races and nationalities, of which it is hard to say which is the least fit for progress and civilization.” What did he think of colonialism? Ahem:
The question is not whether the English had a right to conquer India but whether we are to prefer India conquered by the Turk, by the Persian, by the Russian, to India conquered by the Briton. England has to fulfil a double mission in India: one destructive, the other regenerating: the annihilation of old Asiatic society, and the laying the material foundations of Western society in Asia.
Closer to home, Marx and Engels were thrilled at the way in which “lazy Mexicans” were displaced by “energetic Yankees” in the war with Mexico.
The lesson I draw from all this is a pretty simple one: Marx’s work deserves study today because of a handful of insights and Marxism’s uniquely murderous role in human history. But if you are going to cancel a thinker for bigotry by today’s standards, Marx is far more cancelable on leftist grounds than any of the Enlightenment figures under assault.
And yet he remains a core source for the woke worldview, after being strained through the nihilism of postmodern thought and repackaged for American undergrads. Marx, in fact, is the most assigned economist in college. Among the top schools, The Communist Manifesto is the third-most taught book in history, and first in sociology. The NYT, for his bicentennial on May 5, 2018, ran an op-ed titled, “Happy Birthday, Karl Marx. You Were Right!” — right because “educated liberal opinion is today more or less unanimous in its agreement [over] Marx’s basic thesis — that capitalism is driven by a deeply divisive class struggle. … Social justice movements like Black Lives Matter and #MeToo, owe something of an unspoken debt to Marx.” And that’s a good thing!
Once you begin to see these deliberate and grotesque omissions, you realize just how deep the bad faith lies. And just how desperate the left now is to root out the Enlightenment principles that make America a free country. While good liberals continue to look the other way.
(Note to readers: This is an excerpt of The Weekly Dish. If you’re already a subscriber, click here to read the full version. This week’s issue also includes: my reasoning for why the Dems can’t really fight back ahead of November; a Bari-Sully podcast on how liberalism is imperiled by the right and left; reader dissents over my criticism of the NYT’s coverage of the subway shooter; more dissents over my latest analysis of Putin’s war; four notable quotes from the week in news; an Yglesias Award for a Dem senator on the border wall, and another one on tanned balls; 15 pieces we recommend from other Substackers we like; a super trippy Mental Health Break; a breathtaking view of a glowing church and another view of mosques in the distance; and, of course, the results of the View From Your Window contest — with a new challenge. Subscribe for the full Dish experience!)
From a new subscriber:
Today I listened to your conversation with Fiona Hill, which was excellent, and then I read you were recovering from Covid … how could I not be a paying subscriber? Love listening and reading almost all of your stuff. Feel better.
Here’s a snippet from that popular Fiona pod:
Also, in case you missed it last week, we published an archive for the Dishcast so you can see all the episodes, clips, and transcripts in one place. (We just added a transcript for John McWhorter, whose episode is still our most downloaded.) The pod just passed its 70th episode, having launched just before the 2020 election. Check out the full list to see if you missed some guests you might want to listen to. For the time being we are keeping the Dishcast free for everyone, in order to give our guests the biggest possible reach and to encourage new ones to join us. If you have enjoyed the podcast so far and haven’t yet subscribed to the Dish, please consider doing so.
Another happy subscriber:
When you moved to Substack, I signed up as a subscriber and picked my own annual price of $54. Why that price? As you know, the Hebrew word for “life” is Chai. Chai has a numerical value of 18, so I just picked a multiple of 18. I specifically paid because I was looking forward to the Dishcast, which turned out to free anyway. Then I find out that annual subscription is $50, so I am actually paying a premium — I’m glad to do so.
In March, I was invited to a small private gathering with my congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She wanted to “meet with the Jewish folk in the district to discuss Israel / Palestine.” First, it was nice to finally meet with my elected representative and not have to pay at the door. On the other hand, I left the meeting thinking:
I never knew I was far right
I only thought I was far out.
Haha. Awesome button. Thanks for subscribing, and Shabbat Shalom.
Why The Democrats Can’t Fight Back
“One way to lose a culture war is to refuse to fight it. Another way to lose it is to let your allies do a lot of unpopular things and then allow the country to believe the only way to stop them is to vote you out of power,” - Jon Chait.
My old friend is urging the Democrats to fight back in the culture war — more directly and powerfully — or face devastating losses in the near future. My own view, for what it’s worth, is that Jon should be more careful in what he asks for.
(Read the rest of that 900-word piece here)
New On The Dishcast: Bari Weiss
She was an op-ed editor at the WSJ and the NYT before leaving to create her own op-ed page on Substack, “Common Sense.” She’s also the author of How to Fight Anti-Semitism, and for some reason one of the most reviled figures on Left Twitter, despite being one of the most gifted editors of her generation. We talk groomers and culture war desperation and the amnesia of recent triumphs.
This was a joint podcast, and you’ll be able to hear a somewhat longer version of the discussion next week on Bari’s pod, “Honestly.” For two clips of our convo — on wokeness enabling the far right, and on the agonizing choice when it comes to gender theory in schools — head over to our YouTube page. Listen to the whole episode here. That link also takes you to a variety of dissents and assents over my convo with Jonathan Haidt about the scourge of social media.
Dissents Of The Week: Seeing CRT From My House
On my piece criticizing the NYT’s coverage of the subway shooter, a reader writes:
Woah, woah, woah now. I share your dislike for CRT, but to link Frank James’s racist views to CRT is just as much of a baseless shoehorning of one’s desired narrative as the media coverage of the Atlanta shooting that you (rightly) complained about. I see none of the telltale CRT buzzwords — and lord knows the true CRT acolytes never miss a chance to use those — in any of your quotes from James. I see only racism, untied to any intellectual underpinning and certainly not informed by a reading list.
Read the rest of that dissent, along with three others (on the NYT and Putin’s war), and my responses to all of them, here. As always, keep the criticism coming: firstname.lastname@example.org.
In The ‘Stacks
This is a feature in the paid version of our newsletter spotlighting about a dozen of our favorite pieces from other Substackers every week. This week’s selection covers subjects such as the French election, Trump’s Big Lie, and Dem prospects in November. Here are a few examples:
In a critical review of Rethinking Sex, Oliver Traldi runs through many of the double standards of straight dating.
The case against the college essay — leave the SAT alone!
You can also browse all the Substack writers we follow and read on a regular basis here — a combination of our favorite writers and new ones we’re checking out. It’s a blogroll of sorts. If you have any recommendations for “In the ‘Stacks,” especially ones from emerging writers, please let us know: email@example.com.
The View From Your Window Contest
Where do you think it’s located? Email your guess to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please put the location — city and/or state first, then country — in the subject line. Proximity counts if no one gets the exact spot. Bonus points for fun facts and stories. The winner gets the choice of a VFYW book or two annual Dish subscriptions. If you are not a subscriber, please indicate that status in your entry and we will give you a free month subscription if we select your entry for the contest results (example here if you’re new to the contest). Happy sleuthing!
The results for last week’s window are coming in a separate email to paid subscribers later today.
See you next Friday.